Set up
Run and protect
The same model that writes your policies reads the standards every morning, so the drafting and the watching are the same system rather than two suppliers.
The businesses and tools Australian operators already run on.
A chat window will write you a policy. It will not know whether the clause it cited still exists.
A general model has no idea which registration groups you hold, so it writes a confident document for a provider that is not you.
Nothing in a chat window is watching the standard, so the answer that was right in March is still being repeated in October.
An auditor asks who approved this and when. A pasted answer has no version, no owner and no trail behind it.
Three jobs, and a person at the end of each one. It never publishes, submits or approves anything by itself, which is the only responsible way to run this in a regulated setting.
The standards, and your account
It works from the published standards and from what is actually in your account: your registration groups, your services, your sites, your documents and your evidence. That is what makes a draft specific to you rather than a confident description of a provider in general.
Policies, replies and the tedious middle
Policies and procedures, an incident write-up, a reply to an enquiry, a service page, the summary of what changed this week. Every draft names the clause or the record it came from, so the person approving it can check the working rather than take it on faith.
And hands it back to a person
Every morning it re-reads the standards against what you hold and reports what moved. Nothing it produces becomes your policy, your submission or your published page until you approve it, and the approval is recorded with a name and a date against the version it applies to.
What it drafts
The writing that eats a week and has to be right, produced against your actual obligations.
What it watches
The reading nobody has time to do daily, done daily, against the source rather than a summary.
What it never does
The limits are part of the design, not a disclaimer bolted on afterwards.
A chat window can write you a document. It cannot know which registration groups you hold, whether the clause it cited still exists, or who approved the version you are relying on.
Your groups, services and records, not a general description.
Every draft names the clause or record it came from.
Not a summary from last year, and not only when you ask.
Nothing is published, submitted or approved without you.
Each panel describes how Dallo is built, not an outcome it guarantees. Drafts are drafts: nothing becomes a policy, a submission or a published page without a person approving it.
ISO 27001
Certified information security management.
SOC 2 Type II
Controls tested across a full audit period, not a single day.
Privacy Act
Participant records handled to Australian Privacy Principles.
Essential Eight
Hardened to the ACSC Essential Eight baseline.
Dallo helps you meet your obligations. It does not replace them, and no software can guarantee a regulatory outcome. Dallo is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or acting on behalf of the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission or the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission.
Allied health
“We were paying a retainer to chase our own paperwork. That line is gone from the budget.”Read the story
General Manager Harbourline Health
Harbourline Health
Aged care provider
“The auditor read our incident procedure back to us and it described what we genuinely do. That had never happened before.”Read the story
Quality Lead Melbourne Allied Health
Melbourne Allied Health
Multi-site provider
“Four sites, one list every morning. It is the only compliance thing I read start to finish.”Read the story
Director Northbridge Care Group
Northbridge Care GroupThe questions operators ask before they let a model near a regulated business.
No. It drafts and it flags. Nothing becomes your policy, your submission or your published page until a person approves it, and that approval is recorded with a name and a date against the version it applies to.
Every draft names the clause of the standard or the record in your account it was written from, so you can check the working rather than trust the output. Where it has nothing to work from, it says so instead of filling the gap.
No. Your documents, records and participant information are used to do your work and nothing else. They are not used to train models and they are never shared outside your account.
You edit the draft, and the edit is the version that is stored. Because every draft is reviewed before it counts for anything, a wrong draft costs you a correction rather than a compliance problem, which is precisely why approval is not optional.
It replaces the typing, not the judgement. Someone still has to know the service, make the calls and own the decisions. What changes is that they spend their time on those rather than on drafting and re-reading.
The policy pack, the daily checks, the evidence list, the website copy and the marketing drafts all run on it. It is one system rather than a feature bolted onto each product, which is how the daily check knows which of your documents a clause change affects.
Start free, and see what it produces for your services before you approve a word of it.
Certified standards. Verified practices.
